Value of urinary levels of interleukin-6, epidermal growth factor, monocyte chemoattractant protein type1 and transforming growth factor ß1 in predicting the extent of fibrosis lesions in kidney biopsies of patients with IgA nephropathy. / Valor de los niveles urinarios de interleucina 6, factor de crecimiento epidérmico, proteína quimioatractante de monocitos de tipo 1 y factor de crecimiento transformante ß1 para la predicción de la extensión de las lesiones de fibrosis en biopsias de enfermos con nefropatía IgA.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the associations between urinary levels of IL-6 EGF, MCP-1 and TGFß1 and clinical, biochemical and histopathological characteristics in patients with primary IgA nephropathy and their ability to predict the extent of lesions of glomerular and/or interstitial sclerosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 58 patients with IgA nephropathy were studied. We determined the urine levels of IL-6, EGF, MCP-1, and TGFß1 at the time of diagnosis. The extent of glomerular and interstitial fibrosis was analyzed by quantitative morphometry and kidney biopsies were classified according to the Oxford criteria. We analysed the ability of these molecules to predict the extent of glomerular and interstitial fibrosis lesions. RESULTS: IL-6, TGFß1 and MCP-1 were associated with focal glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis extension but not with the presence of mesangial, extracapillary or endocapillary proliferation. EGF showed a negative association with interstitial fibrosis. By categorising patients according to the Oxford classification, patients with T1 and T2 scores had significantly higher levels of IL-6, MCP-1, TGF-ß1 and significantly lower levels of EGF than patients with T0 scores. By multiple regression and logistic regression analyses, the levels of MCP-1, IL-6 and EGF were independent predictors of the fibrosis surface, after adjusting for age and eGFR. CONCLUSION: The urinary concentration of IL-6, EGF and MCP-1 provides additional information that significantly improves the estimation of the surface of interstitial fibrosis in patients with IgA nephropathy.

Estudio de las variables asociadas a la activación local del complemento en la nefropatía IgA idiopática / Study of the variables associated with local complement activation in IgA nephropathy

Objetivos: 1) Identificar las variables que se asocian con los niveles urinarios de MBL, C4d y C5b-9 en enfermos con nefropatía IgA idiopática. 2) Analizar si los niveles urinarios de MBL o C4d son útiles para identificar la presencia de depósitos mesangiales de C4d/MBL. Pacientes y método: Se estudió a 96 enfermos con nefropatía IgA primaria. Se registraron las variables demográficas, clínicas y bioquímicas en el momento del diagnóstico. Las lesiones renales se cuantificaron mediante la clasificación de Oxford. En las biopsias, se realizaron tinciones inmunohistoquímicas para MBL, properdina, C4d, y C5b-9. En orina, se determinó el nivel de properdina, MBL, C4d y C5b-9. Resultados: Los predictores independientes de los niveles de C4d y MBL en orina fueron el depósito mesangial de cada una de ellas y, en menor grado, la proteinuria. Los predictores independientes de los niveles urinarios de C5b-9 fueron los niveles de MBL y properdina, y la proteinuria. La excreción urinaria de C4d tuvo una sensibilidad del 90% (IC 95%: 58,7-99) y una especificidad del 73% (IC 95%: 54-87) para la detección de depósitos mesangiales de C4d y el nivel de MBL tuvo una sensibilidad del 83,9% (IC 95%: 62-95) y una especificidad del 81,6% (IC 95%: 65-92) para identificar depósitos mesangiales de MBL. Conclusión: El principal predictor de la concentración urinaria de C4d y MBL es la presencia de depósitos mesangiales de ellas. La MBL podría contribuir a la activación del complemento en la luz tubular a través de la vía de las lectinas. Los niveles urinarios de MBL y C4d podrían ser biomarcadores sensibles y específicos para la identificación de los enfermos que presentan depósitos mesangiales de MBL o C4d (AU)

Objectives: 1. To identify the variables that are associated with urinary levels of properdin, MBL, C4d, and C5b-9 in patients with idiopathic IgA nephropathy. 2. To analyse whether urinary levels of MBL and/or C4d are useful for identifying the presence of mesangial deposits of C4d/MBL. Patients and method: A total of 96 patients with IgA nephropathy were studied. Demographic, clinical and biochemical variables were recorded at the time of diagnosis. Renal lesions were quantified using the Oxford classification. Immunohistochemical staining for MBL, MASP-2, properdin, C4d, and C5b-9 was performed in kidney biopsies, and in urine, the levels of properdin, MBL, C4d and C5b-9 were determined. Results: In multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of C4d and MBL levels in urine were the mesangial deposits of each protein and, to a lesser extent, the urinary protein excretion. The independent predictors of urinary levels of C5b-9 were MBL properdin and proteinuria. Urinary excretion of C4d had a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI: 58,7 to 99) and a specificity of 73% (95% CI: 54-87) for detecting mesangial C4d deposits, and the level of MBL had a sensitivity of 83.9% (95% CI: 62-95) and a specificity of 81.6% (95% CI: 65-92) for identifying mesangial deposits of MBL. Conclusion: The main predictor of urinary concentration of C4d and MBL was the presence of their respective mesangial deposits. Urine MBL may contribute to complement activation in the tubular luz through the lectin pathway. Urinary levels of MBL and C4d could be sensitive and specific biomarkers for the identification of patients with mesangial deposits of MBL and C4d (AU)

Study of the variables associated with local complement activation in IgA nephropathy. / Estudio de las variables asociadas a la activación local del complemento en la nefropatía IgA idiopática.

OBJECTIVES: 1. To identify the variables that are associated with urinary levels of properdin, MBL, C4d, and C5b-9 in patients with idiopathic IgA nephropathy. 2. To analyse whether urinary levels of MBL and/or C4d are useful for identifying the presence of mesangial deposits of C4d/MBL. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A total of 96 patients with IgA nephropathy were studied. Demographic, clinical and biochemical variables were recorded at the time of diagnosis. Renal lesions were quantified using the Oxford classification. Immunohistochemical staining for MBL, MASP-2, properdin, C4d, and C5b-9 was performed in kidney biopsies, and in urine, the levels of properdin, MBL, C4d and C5b-9 were determined. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of C4d and MBL levels in urine were the mesangial deposits of each protein and, to a lesser extent, the urinary protein excretion. The independent predictors of urinary levels of C5b-9 were MBL properdin and proteinuria. Urinary excretion of C4d had a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI: 58,7 to 99) and a specificity of 73% (95% CI: 54-87) for detecting mesangial C4d deposits, and the level of MBL had a sensitivity of 83.9% (95% CI: 62-95) and a specificity of 81.6% (95% CI: 65-92) for identifying mesangial deposits of MBL. CONCLUSION: The main predictor of urinary concentration of C4d and MBL was the presence of their respective mesangial deposits. Urine MBL may contribute to complement activation in the tubular luz through the lectin pathway. Urinary levels of MBL and C4d could be sensitive and specific biomarkers for the identification of patients with mesangial deposits of MBL and C4d.

Evolución del título de anticuerpos contra el receptor tipo M de la fosfolipasa A2 y respuesta clínica en pacientes con nefropatía membranosa idiopática tratados con tacrolimus / Evolution of antibody titre against the M-type phospholipase A2 receptor and clinical response in idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients treated with tacrolimus

Introducción y objetivos: Se ha descrito que el nivel de anticuerpos circulantes contra el receptor tipo M de la fosfolipasa A2 tiene correlación significativa con la actividad clínica de la enfermedad en la nefropatía membranosa idiopática (NMI). Sin embargo, la utilidad de la monitorización del título de anticuerpos como predictor de respuesta clínica tras el inicio del tratamiento no ha sido formalmente analizada. En el siguiente estudio se analiza el valor predictivo de la evolución del título de anticuerpos anti-PLA2R sobre la respuesta clínica en enfermos con NMI tratados con tacrolimus. Pacientes y métodos: 36 enfermos con síndrome nefrótico secundario a NMI, con criterios de indicación de tratamiento inmunosupresor, fueron tratados con tacrolimus en monoterapia. Se determinó el nivel de anticuerpos anti-PLA2R antes del tratamiento y a los 3, 6, 9 y 12 meses tras su inicio. Se analizó el valor predictivo de la pendiente de reducción en el título de anticuerpos y de la reducción absoluta y relativa en el título de anticuerpos a los 3 y 6 meses sobre el tiempo hasta la remisión y sobre la probabilidad de remisión a los 6, 9 y 12 meses. Resultados: La reducción relativa en el título de anticuerpos anti-PLA2R fue significativamente mayor en los enfermos que presentaron remisión y precedió a la respuesta clínica. No se apreció asociación entre el título de anticuerpos previo al tratamiento con el tiempo medio de respuesta o la respuesta a los 12 meses. La pendiente de reducción en el título de anticuerpos se asoció significativamente con el tiempo hasta la evidencia de remisión. La reducción relativa en el título de anticuerpos anti-PLA2R a los 3 meses tuvo una elevada sensibilidad y especificidad para predecir la respuesta a los 6 y 9 meses, pero no a los 12 meses, mientras que la reducción relativa en el título de anticuerpos a los 6 meses tuvo una elevada sensibilidad y especificidad para predecir la respuesta a los 12 meses. Conclusión: En enfermos con NMI asociada a anticuerpos anti-PLA2R, la monitorización del título de anticuerpos tras el inicio del tratamiento es útil para estimar el período de tiempo hasta la remisión y para predecir la probabilidad de remisión a los 12 meses (AU)

Introduction and objectives: The level of circulating antibodies against M-type phospolipase A2 receptor has been reported as having a significant correlation with clinical activity in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. However, the usefulness of monitoring antibody titre as a predictor of clinical response following the onset of treatment has not been formally analysed. The predictive value of the evolution of anti-PLA2R antibody titre on the clinical response of idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients treated with tacrolimus is analysed in the following study. Patients and method: 36 patients with nephrotic syndrome secondary to idiopathic membranous nephropathy with immunosuppressive treatment indication criteria were treated with tacrolimus in monotherapy. The level of anti-PLA2R antibodies was determined before treatment and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the onset of treatment. The study analysed the predictive value of the reduction in antibody titre and the relative and absolute reduction in antibody titre at 3 and 6 months over the period until remission and on the probability of remission at 6, 9 and 12 months. Results: The relative reduction in the anti-PLA2R antibody titre was significantly greater in those patients with remission and it preceded the clinical response. No association was observed between the antibody titre prior to treatment and the mean response time or the response at 12 months. Reduction in antibody titre is significantly associated with the time until signs of remission. Relative reduction in anti-PLA2R antibody titre at 3 months had a high sensitivity and specificity to predict the response at 6 and 9 months, but not at 12 months; however the relative reduction in the antibody titre at 6 months had a high sensitivity and specificity for predicting the response at 12 months. Conclusion: In patients with IMN associated with anti-PLA2R antibodies, the monitoring of antibody titre following the onset of treatment is useful for estimating the time period until remission and predicting the probability of remission at 12 months (AU)

Evolution of antibody titre against the M-type phospholipase A2 receptor and clinical response in idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients treated with tacrolimus.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The level of circulating antibodies against M-type phospolipase A2 receptor has been reported as having a significant correlation with clinical activity in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. However, the usefulness of monitoring antibody titre as a predictor of clinical response following the onset of treatment has not been formally analysed. The predictive value of the evolution of anti-PLA2R antibody titre on the clinical response of idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients treated with tacrolimus is analysed in the following study. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 36 patients with nephrotic syndrome secondary to idiopathic membranous nephropathy with immunosuppressive treatment indication criteria were treated with tacrolimus in monotherapy. The level of anti-PLA2R antibodies was determined before treatment and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the onset of treatment. The study analysed the predictive value of the reduction in antibody titre and the relative and absolute reduction in antibody titre at 3 and 6 months over the period until remission and on the probability of remission at 6, 9 and 12 months. RESULTS: The relative reduction in the anti-PLA2R antibody titre was significantly greater in those patients with remission and it preceded the clinical response. No association was observed between the antibody titre prior to treatment and the mean response time or the response at 12 months. Reduction in antibody titre is significantly associated with the time until signs of remission. Relative reduction in anti-PLA2R antibody titre at 3 months had a high sensitivity and specificity to predict the response at 6 and 9 months, but not at 12 months; however the relative reduction in the antibody titre at 6 months had a high sensitivity and specificity for predicting the response at 12 months. CONCLUSION: In patients with IMN associated with anti-PLA2R antibodies, the monitoring of antibody titre following the onset of treatment is useful for estimating the time period until remission and predicting the probability of remission at 12 months.

Tratamiento de la glomeruloesclerosis focal y segmentaria idiopática: opciones en caso de resistencia a corticosteroides y anticalcineurínicos / Treatment of idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: options in the event of resistance to corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors

La mitad de los enfermos con síndrome nefrótico causado por glomeruloesclerosis focal y segmentaria (GFS) primaria presentan resistencia al tratamiento con esteroides. En caso de corticorresistencia, la mejor opción basada en la evidencia ha sido clásicamente el tratamiento con inhibidores de calcineurina, aunque estudios recientes indican que micofenolato podría tener una eficacia similar. En los enfermos con resistencia a anticalcineurínicos, no existe ninguna opción capaz de modificar el curso clínico de la enfermedad, avalada por ensayos clínicos de diseño apropiado, aunque en estudios observacionales se ha sugerido la posible utilidad de micofenolato, sirolimus, rituximab, aféresis o altas dosis de galactosa como opciones terapéuticas. En las GFS de origen idiopático, resistentes a esteroides y anticalcineurínicos, antes de tomar la decisión de ensayar o no otros fármacos inmunosupresores, podría ser apropiado realizar un análisis sistemático que contemplara: 1) considerar si la dosis y el tiempo de tratamiento con esteroides y anticalcineurínicos fueron adecuados; 2) analizar el nivel de expresión de la glicoproteína P en los linfocitos; 3) considerar realizar una nueva biopsia renal en caso de que en la primera no se disponga de estudio de microscopía electrónica; 4) en enfermos jóvenes, considerar un estudio genético para descartar la presencia de la variante p.R229Q de la podocina en combinación con mutaciones heterozigotas en NPHS2, y 4) considerar la gravedad y dificultad de manejo del síndrome nefrótico y la probabilidad de pérdida progresiva de la función renal. En la actualidad, hay múltiples vías de estudio para intentar identificar los mecanismos patogénicos causantes de la lesión podocitaria y hay también en curso varios estudios para analizar la eficacia de fármacos como adalimumab, fresolimumab, rosiglitazona, ACTH (corticotropina) o galactosa a altas dosis, cuyos resultados preliminares han generado expectativas que requieren ser confirmadas en estudios clínicos a mayor escala. En un futuro, es posible que el mejor conocimiento de la vía o vías patogénicas causantes de GFS permita diferenciar entre las formas inmunomodulables y las que no lo son, pero, hoy por hoy, este desafío continúa plenamente vigente

Half of patients with nephrotic syndrome caused by primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) have resistance to treatment with steroids. In the case of corticosteroid resistance, the best evidence-based option has classically been treatment with calcineurin inhibitors, although recent studies indicate that mycophenolate may have similar efficacy. In patients with resistance to calcineurin inhibitors, there is no option that allows the clinical course of the disease to be modified, and this is supported by appropriately designed clinical trials, although observational studies have suggested the potential usefulness of mycophenolate, sirolimus, rituximab, apheresis or high galactose doses as treatment options. In FSGS of idiopathic origin, resistant to steroids and calcineurin inhibitors, before taking the decision whether or not to test other immunosuppressive drugs, it might be appropriate to conduct a systematic analysis that considers: 1) evaluating whether the dose and duration of treatment with steroids and calcineurin inhibitors were suitable, 2) analysing the level of P-glycoprotein expression in lymphocytes, 3) performing a new renal biopsy if there is no electron microscopic study available for the first, 4) in young patients, considering a genetic study to rule out the presence of the podocin variant pR229Q in combination with heterozygous mutations in NPHS2, and 5) evaluating the seriousness and difficulty of managing the nephrotic syndrome and the likelihood of progressive loss of renal function. Currently, there are multiple study avenues that attempt to identify the pathogenic mechanisms that cause podocyte injury and there are also several studies underway to analyse the efficacy of drugs such as adalimumab, fresolimumab, rosiglitazone, ACTH (corticotropin) or galactose at high doses, whose preliminary results have generated expectations that require confirmation in larger-scale clinical studies. In the future, it is possible that a better understanding of the pathogenic pathway or pathways that cause FSGS may allow differentiation between immunomodulable and non-immunomodulable forms, however, this continues to be a challenge for today

Treatment of idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: options in the event of resistance to corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors.

Half of patients with nephrotic syndrome caused by primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) have resistance to treatment with steroids. In the case of corticosteroid resistance,  the best evidence-based option has classically been treatment with calcineurin inhibitors,  although recent studies indicate that mycophenolate may have similar efficacy. In patients with resistance to calcineurin inhibitors,  there is no option that allows the clinical course of the disease to be modified, and this is supported by appropriately designed clinical trials, although observational studies have suggested the potential usefulness of mycophenolate, sirolimus, rituximab, apheresis or high galactose doses as treatment options. In FSGS of idiopathic origin, resistant to steroids and calcineurin inhibitors, before taking the decision whether or not to test other immunosuppressive drugs, it might be appropriate to conduct a systematic analysis that considers: 1) evaluating whether the dose and duration of treatment with steroids and calcineurin inhibitors were suitable, 2) analysing the level of P-glycoprotein expression in lymphocytes, 3) performing a new renal biopsy if there is no electron microscopic study available for the first, 4) in young patients,  considering a genetic study to rule out the presence of the podocin variant pR229Q in combination with heterozygous mutations in NPHS2,  and 5) evaluating the seriousness and difficulty of managing the nephrotic syndrome and the likelihood of progressive loss of renal function. Currently, there are multiple study avenues that attempt to identify the pathogenic mechanisms that cause podocyte injury and there are also several studies underway to analyse the efficacy of drugs such as adalimumab, fresolimumab, rosiglitazone, ACTH (corticotropin) or galactose at high doses, whose preliminary results have generated expectations that require confirmation in larger-scale clinical studies.  In the future, it is possible that a better understanding of the pathogenic pathway or pathways that cause FSGS may allow differentiation between immunomodulable and non-immunomodulable forms,  however, this continues to be a challenge currently.

Biomarcadores en el síndrome nefrótico: algunos pasos más en el largo camino / Biological markers of nephrotic syndrome: a few steps forward in the long way

Uno de los retos a los que debe enfrentarse la nefrología moderna es el de identificar biomarcadores que se asocien a patrones anatomopatológicos o a mecanismos patogénicos definidos y permitan el diagnóstico no invasivo de la causa del síndrome nefrótico o establecer subgrupos pronósticos en cada tipo de enfermedad, prediciendo la respuesta al tratamiento y/o la aparición de recidivas. Los avances en el conocimiento de la patogenia de las distintas enfermedades causantes de síndrome nefrótico, sumados al progresivo desarrollo y estandarización de las técnicas de proteómica plasmática y urinaria, han permitido ir identificando un número creciente de moléculas que podrían ser útiles para los fines anteriormente mencionados. En el momento actual, los datos de muchos de los candidatos identificados, sobre todo mediante técnicas de proteómica, son todavía muy preliminares. En la presente revisión, se resume la evidencia disponible sobre las moléculas que en la actualidad cuentan con mayor evaluación en estudios clínicos (AU)

One of the major challenges modern nephrology should face is the identification of biomarkers that are associated with histopathological patterns or defined pathogenic mechanisms that might aid in the non-invasive diagnosis of the causes of nephrotic syndrome, or in establishing prognosis sub-groups based on each type of disease, thus predicting response to treatment and/or recurrence. Advancements in the understanding of the pathogenesis of the different diseases that cause nephrotic syndrome, along with the progressive development and standardisation of plasma and urine proteomics techniques, have facilitated the identification of a growing number of molecules that might be useful for these objectives. Currently, the available information for many of the possible candidates identified to date, above all those discovered using proteomics, are still very preliminary. In this review, we summarise the available evidence for the different molecules that have been best assessed using clinical studies (AU)

Biological markers of nephrotic syndrome: a few steps forward in the long way.

One of the major challenges modern nephrology should face is the identification of biomarkers that are associated with histopathological patterns or defined pathogenic mechanisms that might aid in the non-invasive diagnosis of the causes of nephrotic syndrome, or in establishing prognosis sub-groups based on each type of disease, thus predicting response to treatment and/or recurrence. Advancements in the understanding of the pathogenesis of the different diseases that cause nephrotic syndrome, along with the progressive development and standardisation of plasma and urine proteomics techniques, have facilitated the identification of a growing number of molecules that might be useful for these objectives. Currently, the available information for many of the possible candidates identified to date, above all those discovered using proteomics, are still very preliminary. In this review, we summarise the available evidence for the different molecules that have been best assessed using clinical studies.